It’s all over for Phhhoto, a photo sharing app startup that had been locked in an antitrust case. On Monday, a judge dismissed the suit that had been leveled against mobile social network Meta.
The case began when Phhhoto claimed Meta, who had recently acquired the photo sharing app Path, had engaged in antitrust practices. In the suit, Phhhoto alleged that Meta had engaged in anticompetitive activities by using its size and power in the market to buy out competitors, forcing a monopoly that severely harmed Phhhoto’s ability to compete.
Meta responded with a motion to dismiss the suit, citing that there wasn’t enough evidence to prove that it had actually engaged in such practices. The judge agreed, and thus dismissed the case. After Phhhoto repeatedly failed to provide evidence to substantiate their claims, the judge determined that Phhhoto’s allegations did not amount to proof that Meta had engaged in antitrust practices.
This case is indicative of a larger trend in the tech space, where companies regularly try to buy out their competitors to gain market advantage and dominate the industry. The issue here was that Phhhoto couldn’t provide evidence to back up their claims of wrongdoing. Acquiring a company that may be a direct competitor doesn’t amount to antitrust practices on its own, and in this case it wasn’t possible to prove that there was any kind of nefarious intent at play.
It’s a sobering lesson for startups, particularly those in the tech space, to be aware of the risks when dealing with larger competitors. It’s possible to get caught up in a legal battle and end up spending considerable amounts of money on legal fees, even if the case doesn’t amount to anything. While it’s true that technological progress is often driven by competition and that competition should not be stifled, it’s important to be aware of the legal risks that come along with it.
Hey Subscribe to our newsletter for more articles like this directly to your email.